Babylonokia.jpg
Supports / records: Author attribution and license; dates distinguished
Limit: Commons metadata is not proof of the first online publication
Open source ↗Source ledger and verifiable claims
This ledger separates image provenance, contemporary coverage, later research and fact-checking. Not every linked page was fully accessible at the last review; those limits are stated explicitly.
Supports / records: Author attribution and license; dates distinguished
Limit: Commons metadata is not proof of the first online publication
Open source ↗Supports / records: Public claim, creator statement and clarification
Limit: Does not independently reconstruct earliest source
Open source ↗Supports / records: 20 Dec 2014 trace, reproduced captions, source limitations
Limit: Post date and original posting are distinct
Open source ↗Supports / records: Research scope and investigation
Limit: Research account, not a peer-reviewed publication
Open source ↗Supports / records: Missing posts and the role of archival traces
Limit: Availability of all original documents not guaranteed
Open source ↗Supports / records: Renewed TikTok narrative; creator identification
Limit: Not a measure of global reach
Open source ↗Supports / records: Early English fact-checking reception
Limit: Full content not reverified in this revision
Open source ↗Supports / records: Early corrective coverage
Limit: Direct page access blocked at review; detail not reverified
Open source ↗Supports / records: Creator-side account
Limit: Primary testimony, not independent verification
Open source ↗Supports / records: Regional reception
Limit: Full text not reverified in this revision
Open source ↗Twenty-three contemporary screen captures from a private OneDrive collection preserve search-result pages visible in early January 2016. Six are displayed below. They document discoverability and the wording of search snippets—not the original publication date or the truth of the stories.
E-MEDIA, March 2016, pp. 40–41, published a contemporary report by Mathias Bertsch on the alleged “alien phone” and the creator’s account. The private PDF was consulted for cataloguing; the magazine pages are not reproduced here.
The English Wikipedia article provides a useful current overview and links to other language editions. As a collaborative and editable reference work, it is a tertiary guide—not an independent primary source for the origin of the artwork or the media chain. Consult its citations and revision history for verification.